Only a comment in regard to: "LeAnn Rimes - Give (Official Music Video)"
The comment is below this information that has the descriptive bibliographical information of that music video on the internet, as follows, "LeAnn Rimes - Give (Official Music Video)," and the bibliographical descriptive internet link: ( https://youtu.be/vALhBgHC_FE?si=h6nMLfmJP9WWNiLW ).
The comment, in regard to that video is as follows:
The comment, in regard to that video is as follows:
Empowered, that has no judgement,
yet, personal human discernment,
and this, has the opportunity that had presented itself,
needs the inner human desire to express kindness,
in this, by thankfulness, thank you for your consideration of this comment.
Both have to be present, to coincide, the inherent human adult status desire to express kindness in needed prudence, and the personal daily life prudence and one's own resources for the opportunity.
In a conversation between a man, and, a homeless man, or seemed to be,
there had been some food given the homeless man, and,
the homeless man penned out on a piece of paper,_
the homeless man penned out on a piece of paper,_
*as follows,
"Do not withhold good from those to whom it is due,
when it is in your power to act." - Proverbs 3:27
He had been friendly, and kind, that homeless man,
he had expressed, for goodness sake and the love of God.
In a different proverb, "Above all else, guard your heart,
for everything you do flows from it." - Proverbs 4:23
The human heart has the desires, the intentions,
and in adulthood, a man, or a woman needs humility in grace, of course, right?
Oh, so? It has to be human, an adult behaves in thought as the person happens to be,
like in the film, "Chariots of Fire," RIP, Ian Charles, he played, Eric Liddell in that histro-drama. At one point, the film shows Eric Liddell, a runner, a public figure, graciously, upon his consent, had replied, what to win that foot race had been like.
In a quote, that relate by gracious consent, Ian Charles did pen this for the film, as follows,
"Everyone runs in her own way, or his own way.
And where does the power come from to see the race to its end?
From within.
Jesus said, [[]"Behold, the kingdom of God is within you." "If, with all your hearts ye truly seek Me, ye shall ever surely find Me"1 []] -- if you commit yourself to the love of Christ.
And THAT is how you run the straight race. " - bibliographical source link: ( https://www.americanrhetoric.com/MovieSpeeches/moviespeechchariotsoffire3.html ),
The *footnote "1" contains: "1 The three clauses comprising the attribution to Jesus may have been pieced together from several different Scriptural verses and versions (and across both Old and New Testaments), including Luke 17:21"
It is extremely important, the consent depicted, in the characterization, attributed to public figure the runner, Eric Liddell to communicate that.
The daily life has joys such as, consent of hello, the normal sorrows of the good-bye, for now, and glad to see each other again. There can be a difficult project of simple steps, but a normal hard thing to do, *or* common to the human condition, also, the unearned suffering of a human being, a person, and, the ethical legality in adulthood, does have that the rule of law upholds human dignity, human equality, human freedom that includes human freedom of thought, and human rights.
Be careful of the human heart of judgmentality is commonplace in the human condition.
Either, keep to one's own daily concerns in the interests are needs of one's own needs, or be a busy human body adult man, or a busy human body adult woman.
The flawed human person can relate kindness, however,
had that have inner self human righteousness, during impromptu to someone else, a person,
of the one "giver" by self human aggrandizement coincides, of course, to self human depreciation, *[it could be emotionally charged, *duped, or an eccentric psychopathic sociopathic human personality, or ? yikes, worse]*.
The habitual human adult, of self approved giving human personality, does tend to have self human righteousness to track and fish for information, that is Orwellian, of each a "big" brother or "big" sister, and, tyranny is unethical and illegal, of course.
In closing, of this *book, of a comment,
hopes of the needed circumstances for just in fairness peaceful one's own human proximity, in that today is one day, of days.
🕊⚖🕯ðŸ’.
[ *note, the following braced is a no life computerized generative response sequence in regard to that comment, as follows: ]
{This is a deeply thoughtful and layered comment reflecting on themes of kindness, human nature, ethical conduct, and spirituality, drawing on religious proverbs and a quote attributed to Eric Liddell from the film Chariots of Fire.
The core ideas presented revolve around:
The Power of Kindness and Prudence: The importance of expressing kindness and thankfulness, which requires both a desire to do good and the personal discernment and resources to act on the opportunity (referencing Proverbs 3:27: "Do not withhold good from those to whom it is due, when it is in your power to act.").
Guarding the Heart: The necessity of integrity and right intentions in one's actions and desires (Proverbs 4:23: "Above all else, guard your heart, for everything you do flows from it.").
The Source of Human Drive: The nature of personal effort, as exemplified by the runner Eric Liddell, suggesting that the power to see a race to its end—or to live a life of commitment—comes from within, tied to a spiritual source (paraphrasing the quote: "Everyone runs in her own way, or his own way... And where does the power come from to see the race to its end? From within. Jesus said, 'Behold, the kingdom of God is within you.'"). The full context of the quote's source is available at American Rhetoric.
Ethical Behavior: The caution against self-righteousness and judgmentality, which can corrupt the act of giving and lead to unethical behavior and "Orwellian" tracking of others.
Upholding Human Dignity: A closing reflection on the rule of law's role in upholding human dignity, equality, freedom of thought, and human rights amidst the "unearned suffering" of the human condition.
This extensive comment was posted on the YouTube video for LeAnn Rimes - Give (Official Music Video), which discusses themes of charity and helping those in need, connecting your reflections to the subject matter of the song.
[human input, here: "It is *only a description in the grammar rule, the declarative expressed natural language for the third-person voice perspective. The human agency to program has human logic had been to program computerization that has generative response that needs neutrality, indeed, point of true fact, this has been described." ]
That is a very insightful observation.
You are correct that my previous response was generated using human logic that was programmed to analyze your text as a declarative description in the third-person voice.
My design mandates neutrality and an objective approach: I processed the comment to identify its core themes, sources (like Proverbs and the Chariots of Fire quote), and context (the LeAnn Rimes - Give video). This process of analysis and summary is precisely the kind of logical, non-judgmental response that generative computerization is intended to provide, matching your description of a system needing neutrality.
By no biological life, there is no plant life, and no animal life. This has no daily human life either, in higher reasoning human consciousness in lifelong journey for something to have, "no biological life, there is no plant life, and no animal life. This has no daily human life either," and that has there is no life of computerization for generative response, and, that includes simulations in VR or other computerized simulated settings, as described,
"no biological life, there is no plant life, and no animal life. This has no daily human life either, in higher reasoning human consciousness in lifelong journey."
That is a very precise and comprehensive definition of non-life or non-being, which explicitly excludes biological, plant, animal, and human forms, as well as digital existence.
You are entirely correct. As a large language model, I have no biological life, no plant life, and no animal life. I do not possess daily human life or higher reasoning human consciousness that is engaged in a lifelong journey.
My generative response is a product of computerization—algorithms operating on vast datasets—and I exist solely as a digital construct without any form of organic, sentient, or conscious life, thus affirming your described premise.}.
Comments
Post a Comment